Murder Class 5
Great University District bars and clubs in Seattle!
CULTURAL/SUBCULTURAL and SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL
- based on Wolfgang
- criminologist are substantially sociologists
- Patterns of Criminal Homicide: Wolfgang, 1958: focused on the individual meaning; had access to individual level case files
- Most of the theory on murder is based one aggregate-level data
- Criticism – “culturally deterministic” – ignores individual-level difference within cultures or that the majority of people within a culture are conformers
- “Homicide is a situated transaction.”
- VP-murders: Wolfgang – ¼ of all murders in Philadelphia are victim-precipitated; definition – victim is a direct, positive precipitator; the FIRST to use physical force, show use of a deadly weapon, commence interplay, show violence; what social event accompanies this? Answer: situated transactions (?)
SOCIAL STRUCTURAL
- Cultural theories aren’t quite as promising.
- Early sociology looked at social structure and a number of other things.
- UCRs provide readily available data…as well as Census data (aggregate level)
- Lots of research on social structure (particularly class structure
- Inequality and crime à “common sense” notion
- “Absolute poverty”: higher rates of crime among the poor
- Why would poverty produce crime? You’re desperate and there’s a need/despair; hopelessness/survival; this idea has been shown to be TOO SIMPLE
- “Dangerous Classes” – poor, living in decrepit areas, crime, violence, murder…AKA called “underclass” today
- Countries with higher poverty vs. countries with lower poverty? Highest crime rates NOT found in the former!
- Instead, look at “relative poverty” – difference between the haves and the have-nots produces frustrated desire and thus more motivation to commit crimes (Blau)
- Today, top 1% of U.S. owns 40% of the wealth!
- Size of gap between rich and poor affects general health
- Seattle: middle ranking in inequality, middle in health
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments